'Family Size Essay\r'

'As the world frugality weakens, resources continue to lead limited and the interdependence among countries attach, contrary countries adopt been introducing innovative policies which seek to view as the come out at which the human universe of discourse is outgrowth. Most of these policies hasten been geared towards envisionling the number of children a individual family should comport. The main aim of these policies has been to relief the environment and the resources inwardly it some stresses of over exploitation. However while countries equivalent China take away been doing this for a long stopover now, m whatsoever citizenry see it as an baulk with the basic institution (family) and as a extend many mint have been fighting against such(prenominal) policies which seeks to control the number of children a family should have.\r\nWhile check the number of children per family is positive since it would ease in administration planning, enabling the rescue pred iction to be as accurate as possible, if it was to happen in the US, the policies would non work to the advantage of the State due to hardly a(prenominal) reasons which include the fact that, the regular army is not scummy from over cosmos sooner under population, the aging population has been growing at an alarming rate forcing the soil to give high number of immigrants to the US and as a pass on it would not be wise for the US presidential term to control the number of children per family it should be on the other hand support and encourage her citizens to increase the number of children per family for ex axerophtholle by using incentives and then, the US government should not limit the number of children a family should have.\r\nWhy the US government should not control the number of children mass have:\r\nThe total fertility rate rate (defined as the total number of children a woman is belike to have during her lifetime) in the USA in the last decade has been decli ning (Newman, B& Newman, P, 2008). As many and many women concentrate on their education, jobs and careers, the American population has been growing at a very slow rate. As a emergence of countering the problems of a low population growth, the country has been allowing migration of expert workers through the green card draft to transmigrate from their countries to the US to come and offer their expertise in the USA. This program is very beneficial to the country since it allows continuous operation of the industries. If the government controls the number of children flock should have the population will grow even little and the country might cease having an active economy (Hanson, Scheve& Slaughter, 2007). The importance of a young population is the fact that it makes the economy active by ensuring steady-goings and service are moving within the stores. For example new clothes are being bought as good deal are growing aging; items such as phones which have emerged w ith technology improvements still have people to buy them: With an old population, these items would to be bought. As a result, a high young population is good for the economy and thus best for the government interests.\r\nIf the US government could start controlling the number of children a family should have, it would find itself in similar problems which are liner countries in the Eastern European region such as Russia and similarly in Asia such as in Japan where as a result of small family sizes and low fertility rates, the majority of the population is made up of old people. As a result, the governments from these countries have been using large portion of their figure to cater for the old population through pensions and also medical support (Goldsmith& Larson, 2003). With the family sizes also reduced, responsibilities of these senior(a) people are being delegated to the few family members who were innate(p) and as a result instead of these people engaging in national building activities, they cash in ones chips most of their time taking care of the patriarchal whereas with a high population, responsibilities could have been divided advantageously among the many siblings.\r\nAnother economic effect of a controlled family size is the fact that, with a controlled population, almost each citizen is likely to read up to the maximum direct of education and as a result, industries would miss the practically needed cheap labor which they need to go by their companies cheaply. This could force these industries either to use much property to run the companies, close down if they cannot afford the run costs or even relocate to other countries where labor is cheap. As a result, this would deny the government much of its needed revenues since the companies would have to pay for taxes in the countries where their investments are (Navaretti, Castelani& Disdier, 2009).\r\nFinally, many people argue against the uncontrolled number of children in a family due to the high taxes paid in order to advance the extra child born in school. However, with the US government supporting the education of each and every child born in the US, there is likeliness for high social mobility. The education system enables people to move from poor backgrounds to occupy high levels in the government where they pay high taxes thus heavy(p) back to the society (Barnett& Belfield, 2006). The government should thus not be worried about the family sizes of its citizens since the US is not suffering from an overpopulation problem. If each and every person is given a chance to study and become professionals, they would pay high taxes just like any other citizen despite their different social backgrounds.\r\n destination:\r\nWhile controlling of the number of children people should have is a good idea, it would not be advisable for the US government to introduce such laws since the country is not suffering from high population rather it is due to un der population that people migrate to the US through the green card lottery to provide the much needed labor for the US industries. A controlled population would mean sometimes in future the country’s population is likely to be highly composed of old people where the government would have to dig deep into its work out in order to maintain these people and old population could also lead to a irksome economy since the old population does not have need for the emerging products such as phones, computers and so on. It is therefore not advisable for the government to control the number of children people should have.\r\n'