Counterfactual Thinking Essay

The bring of repent arguably relies on a multifaceted, contrary to fact analysis of both antecedently possible consequences. An important suspicion to consider is at what age these conditional emotions develop, and what en equals these responses to occur. Previous explore proposes that wo emerges at roughly 4 historic period sexagenarian, marginally previous than more than recent studies conducted by Guttentag and Ferrell, who suggest that the experience of ruefulness occurs relatively lately in babe discipline. The results of these studies argue that pinch, rather than simply experiencing conditional emotions relies heavily on a childs expertness to simultaneously conceive permutation realities, and that a recognition of differing outcomes is a necessary, rather than sufficient component of the development of ruefulness. These findings compose and extend previous research, and demonstrate that the development of contrary to fact view in children is posit ively correlated with a hard cognitive processing of both alternate realities.The experience of mourning and relief atomic number 18 conditional emotions found on a comparison of human beings with a better, alternating(a) situation. counterfactual emotions are considered to perform important emotional regulatory functions, and require surplus complex cognitive processing than more basic emotions such as anger, fear or happiness. They require us to consider dual possibilities (Byrne, 2002) in which both outcomes were possible at some point in the past. The ability to experience emotions such as regret is believed to play an important post in decision-making following the effect into adulthood. Significant differences however, comprise between when children are thought to first experience regret.It is arguable that childrens ground of regret develops relatively late due to the complex nature of not exclusively hold oning counterfactual thinking (Guttentag and Ferre ll, 2004), which requires an identification and comparison of two evenly possible, alternate actions. If children are unable to feed these comparisons, they are unable to experience the emotion of regret. Little research has been done on the cognitive processes rat the way out of regret in upstart children, and thus many capitulums still exist as to why the experience of counterfactual thinking develops relatively late in childhood. Many inconsistencies exist in the supposed understandings of regret, and subsequently set ahead research is required in order to overcome these age-related discrepancies.counterfactual thinking refers to an ability to think rough what could have been had an alternative decision been yield or had the outcome been different (Roese, 1991). It is within the intriguing paradigm that the current research into the experience of regret takes place. Recent findings have shed raise light into the development of regret during the archaean years of chi ldhood. Beck et al (2006) proposed the theoretical perspective that counterfactual emotions develop relatively late because it requires more complex cognitive processing to conceive two possible outcomes, as remote to recognizing basic emotions of happiness and sadness. This perspective is widely agreed upon, however theories differ in the age at which the emotion of regret actually emerges. Daniel Weisberg (2001) dictated the emergence of regret at or so 4 years, however Guttentag and Ferrell (2004) speculated that it was not until children are 6 or 7 years old that they are able to simultaneously cut through counterfactual and actual situations. Further research however, has revealed that within the emergence of counterfactual thinking, is a distinction between experiencing and reason about regret.The latter involves a reflection on the reasoning behind the emotion, i.e. _why_ does the child feel bad that he/she picked box A mastering nothing, when he/she could have picked b ox B, containing the chocolate. Experiencing regret however, involves a comparison of domain with a better, alternative outcome. Given that it is a difficult task to simultaneously comprehend two equally plausible realities, it must(prenominal) be dismantle more difficult to understanding the reasoning behind _why_ this feels bad. Interestingly, although Guttentag and Ferrell (2004) located the experience of regret first in childhood, they argued that it wasnt until later in bearing around 7 years old that a child was able to demonstrate _why_ an alternative reality might affect the emotional reception to the actual outcome. Guttentag and Ferrell (2004) suggested that children less than 5 or 6 years old cannot generate a comparison between a real and counterfactual reality. According to this perspective, the comparison between two previously possible outcomes is particular. In 2009, Beck and Crilly adapted this theory, and hypothesized that an inability to compare the t wo worlds limits childrens thinking about regret. (Beck, & vitamin A Crilly 2009).Beck, Robinson, Carroll and Apperly (2006) proposed a similar perspective, arguing that it wasnt until children were 5 or 6 years old that counterfactual and actual events were two equally plausible events. Studies conducted following this proposal revealed corresponding results. Children between the ages of 3 and 6 were asked an open and a closed question regarding the pathway chosen by a toy mouse. Children vulcanised 3 found it difficult to justly answer the question what if he had gone the other way, where would he be? as opposed to the saucer-eyedr could he have gone anywhere else? Comparatively, children aged 6 and older performed significantly better, with 85% answering the open question correctly. Beck et al reasoned that regret could not be felt if the child had no understanding of the possibility of a counterfactual reality successor the actual reality. In 2009, Beck and Crilly replicated these studies, but alternatively used an open question and a regret question to measure childrens ability to comprehend regret.The results indicated that, contrary to Beck et al, it is in fact not sufficient to simply do it two counterfactual possibilities in order for children to recognize regret. The study gave more weight to Guttentag and Ferrells 2004 claim that the comparison of two alternate realities is critical in the development of regret. Beck and Crilly (2009) went on to suggest that perhaps understanding two counterfactual realities was a necessary rather than sufficient developmental remnant in the cognitive processing of regret. In 2003, German and Nichols proposed that the experience of counterfactual thinking could occur as early as 4 years of age. In their study, a group of 3 year olds were given stories that problematical two possible outcomes. When given the negative alternative, the children were asked whether the character in the storey would feel happy or sad. German and Nichols reported that children answered more than two thirds of the simple counterfactual questions correctly.This data was used to theorize that children as young as 3 could comprehend basic counterfactual realities, and thus indicated the early emergence of regret. Although much discrepancy exists as the to the exact age at which regret begins to emerge, the view that counterfactual thinking develops much earlier than previously thought has become widely accepted amongst both cognitive and developmental psychologists. However, evidence exists that contradicts this perspective. Beck et al argue that the studies used by German and Nichols contain a number of false positives.Further research has suggested that the supposed counterfactual thinking demonstrated in the 3 year olds tested, could simply be use of the childs general knowledge, and that the questions used were too simple to reliably indicate an experience of regret. Questions used in the experiment by Ger man and Nichols arguably lead to answers that could be answered using the childs general knowledge, such as recognizing that squashed flowers make people unhappy, and unsquashed flowers make people happy (Beck, Robison, Carroll, &type A Apperly 2006). Where German and Nichols may have revealed an emergence of counterfactual thinking may simply have been the childs expression of past experience.The most widely agreed upon theory of regret in childhood appears to be ability to not only deal two previously possible realities, but to likewise compare them in order to come to an emotional understanding. Theorists including Guttentag and Ferrell (2004), and Beck and Crilly (2009) argue that a distinction must be made between simply experiencing a counterfactual emotion, and understanding _why_ someone may feel unhappy when comparing the actual reality with a counterfactual world. This theory is based on the premise that counterfactual thinking is a complex cognitive process, requiring a multifaceted understanding of two dual possibilities.Research on counterfactual thinking in childhood also suggests children may experience regret as early as 4 years old, however this view has generated much review and requires further research in order to rule out experimental limitations, such as small research groups and over generalized questions. rising research may focus on overcoming these limitations in order to generate reliable data. Compiling the findings from these and future studies will enable researchers to form a much clearer of picture of exactly when children not only experience, but also understand the emotion of regret, and what cognitive processes underpin this development. In conclusion, research examining childrens regret has focused on the criticality of the moment children begin to comprehend two dual realities, and feel remorse after choosing one outcome over another. Current studies lend weight to the complex nature of the percentage of cognition in emotional experiences, and this data, taken in conjunction with earlier studies, suggests a number of age-related stepping stones are implicated in the development of counterfactual thinking.REFERENCE LISTBeck, R. S., & Crilly, M. (2009) Is understanding regret dependent on developments in counterfactual thinking? _British Journal of Developmental Psychology_. 27, 505-510.Beck, R. S., Riggs, J. K., & Burns, P. (2001) double developments in counterfactual thinking. _Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation_. 2-21.Beck, S. R., Riggs, J. K., & Gorniak, L. S. (2009) The effect of casual length on counterfactual conditioning reasoning. _British Journal of Developmental Psychology_. Doi 10.1348/026151009X450836.Beck, S. R., Robinson, E. J., Carroll, D. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2006) Childrens thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. _Child Development._ 77, 413-426.Burns, P., Riggs, J. K., & Beck, R. S. (2012) administrator control and theexperience of regret. _Journal of Experimental Child Psychology_. 111(3), 501-515. Doi 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.003.Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004) decision maker functions in children aged 6-13 A dimensional and developmental study. _Developmental Neuropsychology_. 26, 571-593.Diamond, A. (2006) The early development of executive functions. _Lifespan Cognition Mechanisms of Change_, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 70-95.Ferrel, J. M., Guttentag, R. E., Gredlein, J. M. (2009) Childrens understanding of counterfactual emotions Age differences, unmarried differences, and the effects of counterfactual-information salience. _British Journal of Developmental Psychology_. 27, 569-585.Guttentag, R. E., Ferrell, J. (2004) Reality compared with its alternatives Age differences in judgments of regret and relief. _Developmental Psychology_. 40, 764-775.Mitchell, P., Riggs, K. J. (2000) Childrens reasoning and the mind. _Psychology Press_. 121-147.OConnor, E. (2011) T he emergence of regret in childhood. _Pediatrics for Parents_. 27, 11-12.OConnor, E., McCormack, T., & Feeney, A. (2012). The development of regret. _Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,_ 111, 120-127. Doi 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.002.Roese, N. J. (1997) Counterfactaul thinking. _Psychological Bulletin_. 121, 133-148.Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2011) When the alternative would have been better Counterfactual reasoning and the emergence of regret. _Cognition and Emotion_, 26, 800-819.Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2012) Counterfactual reasoning From childhood to adulthood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 114(3), 389-404. Doi 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010.Weisberg, D. P. (2011) Childrens thinking about regret and relief. _University of Birmingham (thesis)_. 56-83.Weisberg, D. P., & Beck, S. R. (2010) Childrens thinking about their own and others regret and relief. _Journal of Experimental Child Psychology_. 106, 184-191.Weisberg, D. P., & Beck , S. R. (2011) The development of childrens regret and relief. _Cognition and Emotion._ 26, 820-835.Van Duijvenvoorder, K. C. A., Hulzenga, M. H., & Jansen, R. J. (2013) What is and what could have been Experiencing regret and relief across childhood. _Cognition and Emotion_, 28, 926-935.Zeelenberg, M., Van Dkik, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1998) The experience of regret and disappointment. _Cognition and Emotion_, 12, 221-230.