Alcoholic Beverage and Quantum Software Essay

Quantum Softw be does indeed have a problem involving a disagreement in the conquerness of a company sponsored neighborly activity. This weekly gathering is finish offered by Quantums management as a reward for their productiveness displayed throughout the week. While the get-together appears to be very commonplace among employees and managers alike, there is at least one party (Bill, the corporate attorney) who voices protest to the weekly festivity (Brown & Harvey, 1995).The problems can be defined in name of macro issues having to do with leadership, resources, and the surrounding infrastructure, and little, which include internal issues such as employee training, empowerment and organizational processes. (Packard 2005). The macro issue is that there is a dissimilarity in opinion on whether or not the beer bust is an appropriate means of rewarding the companys employees. Stan and Erin, the founders of Quantum Software, feel that this time is secure because it provides an opportunity to encourage the group concept (Brown & Harvey, 1995).Bill however, after witnessing an employee stumbling as a result of his drinking, questions the companys li great power of providing alcohol during the snipday. The micro issue, although not specific wholly(a)y stated in the study, is that co role players are subject to visual perception each other as well as members of management in an intoxicated state creating a situation where professional integrity could be compromised. The cause for the conflict is the fact that the company is offering its employees alcohol during work up hours, creating a situation where Quantum would be held liable should an accident occur at work or as the employees were leaving the office.Additional concerns are warranted in considering that not all employees (based on statistically studies of drinking in the workplace) depart be included in an event where drinking alcohol is composite (NZMA, 2006). Additionally, studies show that orga nizations that encourage drinking at work have a higher rate of employees with drinking problems which can greatly affect worker performance (National Institute On Alcohol Abuse And Alcoholism, 2006).Alternative opportunities should be offered to the employees that would achieve the goals that Stan and Erin have set of creating an atmosphere where workers can blow off a little steam without providing alcohol (Brown & Harvey, 1995). Recognizing that the workers are adults and have the ability to make responsible decisions in regards to drinking, perhaps a social commissioning could provide an alternate experience to the beer bust that does not conflict with the beguile of Quantum Software. There are two recommendations that I would offer to the management team of Quantum Software.First, the monies dedicated to offering the current beer bust should be redirected to an offering that includes all employees, including those that do not drink. This will provide an inclusive atmosphere w here all employees can participate. Second, an off-property location should be established by a social committee (not management) where employees have the opportunity to socialize over a beer without the squeeze of work (Brown & Harvey, 1995). This way the employees are on their own time and are responsible for their own actions relieving Quantum Software of any responsibility for its employees actions.References Brown, D. & Harvey D. (2006). An data-based approach to organization and development. Upper Saddle River Pearson National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2008). Alcohol and the workplace Retrieved butt 23, 2008 from http//alcoholism. about. com/od/work/l/blnaa44. htm NZMA (2006).Alcohol consumption. Retrieved March 23, 2008 from http//www. nzma. org. nz/journal/116-1184/645/Figures%20and%20tables. pdf Packard,T. (1995). TQM and organizational change and development. Retrieved March 23, 2008 from http//www. improve. org/tqm. htmlExhibit%20I%20A%20Force%20Field %20.